A bit of database code cleanup.
This commit is contained in:
parent
9f8ef281de
commit
9176e858d5
15
src/db.rs
15
src/db.rs
|
@ -3,6 +3,8 @@ use sled::transaction::abort;
|
|||
use sled::transaction::{TransactionError, TransactionalTree, UnabortableTransactionError};
|
||||
use sled::{Db, Tree};
|
||||
use std::collections::HashMap;
|
||||
use std::path::Path;
|
||||
use std::str;
|
||||
use thiserror::Error;
|
||||
use zerocopy::byteorder::I32;
|
||||
use zerocopy::{AsBytes, LayoutVerified};
|
||||
|
@ -103,8 +105,8 @@ fn convert_i32(raw_value: &[u8]) -> Result<i32, DataError> {
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Atomically alter the count of variables in the database, by the
|
||||
/// given amount. Count cannot go below 0.
|
||||
/// Use a transaction to atomically alter the count of variables in
|
||||
/// the database by the given amount. Count cannot go below 0.
|
||||
fn alter_room_variable_count(
|
||||
variables: &TransactionalTree,
|
||||
room_id: &str,
|
||||
|
@ -127,7 +129,7 @@ fn alter_room_variable_count(
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl Database {
|
||||
pub fn new<P: AsRef<std::path::Path>>(path: P) -> Result<Database, DataError> {
|
||||
pub fn new<P: AsRef<Path>>(path: P) -> Result<Database, DataError> {
|
||||
let db = sled::open(path)?;
|
||||
let variables = db.open_tree("variables")?;
|
||||
let rooms = db.open_tree("rooms")?;
|
||||
|
@ -152,16 +154,15 @@ impl Database {
|
|||
.scan_prefix(prefix)
|
||||
.map(|entry| match entry {
|
||||
Ok((key, raw_value)) => {
|
||||
//Strips room and username from key, leaving
|
||||
//behind name.
|
||||
let variable_name = std::str::from_utf8(&key[prefix_len..])?;
|
||||
//Strips room and username from key, leaving behind name.
|
||||
let variable_name = str::from_utf8(&key[prefix_len..])?;
|
||||
Ok((variable_name.to_owned(), convert_i32(&raw_value)?))
|
||||
}
|
||||
Err(e) => Err(e.into()),
|
||||
})
|
||||
.collect();
|
||||
|
||||
//Convert_I32 to hash map. Can we do this in the first mapping
|
||||
//Convert I32 to hash map. Can we do this in the first mapping
|
||||
//step instead? For some reason this is faster.
|
||||
variables.map(|entries| entries.into_iter().collect())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue